<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AprilScript: ActionScript worst practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/</link>
	<description>Mike Morearty, a developer on the Flex Builder team.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obfuscated ActionScript &#171; I like stuff.</title>
		<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-61548</link>
		<dc:creator>Obfuscated ActionScript &#171; I like stuff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morearty.com/blog/?p=202#comment-61548</guid>
		<description>[...] Morearty  My brother Mike, a developer on the Flex team at Adobe, wrote a pretty impressive bit of Obfuscated ActionScript on his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morearty  My brother Mike, a developer on the Flex team at Adobe, wrote a pretty impressive bit of Obfuscated ActionScript on his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-58578</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morearty.com/blog/?p=202#comment-58578</guid>
		<description>&quot;return Number   &lt;&gt;&lt;&quot;
LOL who knew the compiler liked fish?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;return Number   &lt;&gt;&lt;&quot;<br />
LOL who knew the compiler liked fish?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-58294</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morearty.com/blog/?p=202#comment-58294</guid>
		<description>Whoa. Nicely done. Holy crap my head hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. Nicely done. Holy crap my head hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-58293</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morearty.com/blog/?p=202#comment-58293</guid>
		<description>Yep, &quot;with&quot; is still with us.  It does have a performance impact, although personally I feel that impact is overstated.  My bigger problem with &quot;with&quot; is that I find the resulting code to be confusing.  But if used judiciously, I think it&#039;s fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, &quot;with&quot; is still with us.  It does have a performance impact, although personally I feel that impact is overstated.  My bigger problem with &quot;with&quot; is that I find the resulting code to be confusing.  But if used judiciously, I think it&#8217;s fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lapasa</title>
		<link>http://www.morearty.com/blog/2009/04/01/aprilscript-actionscript-worst-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-58292</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lapasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morearty.com/blog/?p=202#comment-58292</guid>
		<description>&#039;with&#039; keyword is still alive? That&#039;s a time saving sick language feature. I loved using it except i was told back in the day not to use it for performance reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;with&#8217; keyword is still alive? That&#8217;s a time saving sick language feature. I loved using it except i was told back in the day not to use it for performance reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
